Restaurant Financial Model: Chef-at-Table Teppanyaki Restaurant

Model shared teppanyaki tables, integer chef schedules, meal and drink sales, paid support roles and reserve-based startup funding.

  • Excel (.xlsx)
  • Premises: 3,200 sq ft / eight tables / 64 physical seats
  • Target fill: Six guests per table session
  • Service: Six hours Tuesday–Sunday / March 2027 opening

Planning several types? Compare 17 restaurant formats

Workbook preview, read-onlyr02
Chef-at-Table Teppanyaki Restaurant workbook: dashboard.
Dashboard

Base-case scenario controls, annual financial results and charts for 2027–2031. Financial report amounts are shown in thousands of USD; percentage measures retain their own units.

Enlarge image in a new tab

8 selected worksheet views. Figures show this workbook’s starting case.

Workbook availability

What is inside the Excel model

Test how chefs and communal tables work together through complete service cycles. Connect served guests, included-side meals and optional drinks to paid staffing, table-linked assets and cash recovery.

Selected worksheets from the documented workbook. Forecast period: January 2027–December 2031. Model reference: PHY001-14.

Inputs you control. Results you can inspect.

On a small screen, scroll within the table to read every column.

Inputs and outputs for the chef-at-table teppanyaki restaurant workbook.
Planning areaInputs you reviewHow they connectResults to inspect
Tables and chefsEight tables, four planned concurrent chefs, six target guests/session.Schedule each start when both assigned resources are available.24 baseline daily sessions / 144 target-fill guests.
Time and preparation50 chef minutes; 90 table minutes; funded back-kitchen portions.Require table clearance and chef productive time within the window.Feasible sessions and served guests.
Menu economicsChicken, sirloin and shrimp mix; 60% optional drink attachment.Price meals once and add purchased drinks without extra guests.Meal/drink sales, recipe costs and processing.
Staff and assetsPaid relief, support roles and six mandatory opening bundles.Link capacity to paid hours and opening to asset readiness.Funded operation and delayed-opening exposure.
CashAll-equity financing and a $100,000 reserve objective.Cover peak financing-free cash deficit, rounded up to $1,000.Required equity and minimum monthly balance.

Is this the right model for your business?

Check the starting case before changing the assumptions.

The starting operation

  • A communal-table restaurant where chefs prepare included-side meals at the table.
  • An operator planning alternating chef and table cycles.
  • A founder testing demand against a service-heavy payroll and all-equity funding.

Check the boundary

The case excludes alcohol, buffet service, sushi-bar revenue, delivery, debt financing and customer advances.

Compare the other restaurant types

How this business makes money

Connect the unit sold to the resources required by this operating case.

Analysis

Revenue logic
Served guests buy one entree bundle, with optional nonalcoholic drinks on the same bill.

Sold menu units combine entrees and drinks; guest and table-session counts remain separate.

What customers pay for

Guests pay for service; the saved case assumes same-month settlement and no customer advances.

What limits sales

  • A session needs both an available chef and an available table
  • Chef productive minutes and table clearance constrain the integer daily schedule
  • Funded prep, service, host and management resources constrain operation
  • Mandatory asset purchases determine the earliest feasible opening month

Costs to plan for

  • Protein recipes, included sides, ingredient loss and optional drinks
  • Paid table chefs, prep, servers, host, dish and management roles
  • Employer load, benefits and funded relief capacity
  • Gross rent, tenant utilities, hood servicing and other overhead
  • Card processing per payment bill, separate from table sessions

Scope and expansion

  • Test shared-table fill and chef timing before adding seats
  • Fund chefs and support roles alongside table-linked capital
  • Review premises suitability and other assets when changing table count

Why can eight cooking tables need fewer chefs but still hit a chef constraint?

Chef engagement ends before the table clears, allowing one chef to move between tables. Starts must still fit both resources’ availability and the paid productive-minute budget. The integer schedule therefore matters more than adding independent seat and chef capacities.

Chef engagement
50 minutes/session
Table cycle
90 minutes/session
Baseline schedule
24 sessions/day at six target guests

What to establish for your own operation

  1. Time complete chef engagements and table clearance.
  2. Test actual shared-table fill and demand against fixed payroll.
  3. Check site engineering and support capacity before adding tables.

Follow the plan from demand to cash

Open each section for the assumptions, calculations, and limits of this workbook’s starting case.

Schedule chefs and tables as separate resourcesRevenue

A chef is engaged for 50 minutes while the table remains occupied for 90 minutes including dining, payment and reset. Four chefs can alternate eight tables through 24 daily sessions in the saved schedule. At six target guests per session, the resulting ceiling is 144 guests/day.

Partly filled sessions still consume a complete table cycle and chef engagement. The model also checks funded preparation, service and support resources. A table-only capacity calculation would overstate this operating case.

  • The final session can contain fewer than six guests.
  • Daily demand is capped after its launch ramp; March starts at 90 guests/day.
  • Opening follows the latest mandatory asset purchase by at least one month.
Tie equipped tables to investment and opening readinessCAPEX

Initial capital is $349,085.28. Griddles, surrounds/chairs and distributed extraction scale with table inputs; other installed bundles include tenant works, preparation, warewashing and supporting equipment. More tables do not automatically fit the fixed premises.

January equity is $619,000 with no debt. It covers a $518,895.34 financing-free cash deficit plus the $100,000 reserve, rounded upward. Minimum funded cash is $100,104.66 in May 2027.

  • The capital budget and operating/working-capital deficit are separate uses.
  • Assets use seven-year depreciation from purchase, including preopening purchases.
  • Inventory is seven days; receivables, payables and advances are zero.
Test the attendance required by paid service capacityCF

Base 2027 revenue is $1,294,339 from 34,608 served guests, with EBITDA of −$60,613. Monthly EBITDA and operating cash first turn positive in June 2027 and stay positive thereafter.

Project payback occurs in December 2030, month 48. It is cumulative undiscounted unlevered cash recovery, including startup losses and investment, without terminal proceeds. It does not repay the shareholder’s contribution through distributions.

  • Holding mature demand at 90 guests/day produces a −$1,539,509.15 minimum cash balance with original equity fixed.
  • Later price growth does not create more service capacity.
  • An extreme final-month launch exposes a disclosed native IRR convergence limit.

Selected results from the starting case

Modeled results in USD unless stated otherwise. These describe the selected inputs, not an estimate for your location or a guaranteed outcome.

Modeled case
2027 revenue
$1,294,339USD, Base; two setup months and ten service months.
2027 EBITDA
−$60,613USD, Base; full calendar-year result.
Initial CAPEX
$349,085.28USD; table-linked equipment and supporting asset bundles.
Minimum cash
$100,104.66USD, funded Base balance in May 2027.
Project payback
December 2030 / month 48Cumulative undiscounted project FCF recovery from January 2027, with no later reversal.

Make the case your own

Work from the operating plan toward the cash requirement.

  1. Enter table count, shared fill and chef/table timings.

  2. Match paid resource budgets and mandatory purchases to opening.

  3. Replace recipes, prices, installed bids and premises costs.

  4. Review demand downside, required equity and project recovery separately.

Interpretation and scope
  • National analytical inputs do not establish local demand, lease terms or engineering feasibility.
  • Fixed expected menu mix underpins the exact annual percentage food-cost relationship.
  • Same-month settlement omits processor transactions crossing month end.
  • The 26% planning tax rate has no chosen jurisdiction and carries no losses between years.
  • The native IRR solver may display n.a. in an extreme negative-return boundary despite a mathematical root.

The workbook is an Excel file for local planning. Learn how to interpret assumptions and evidence.

Each operating type calls for its own financial structure.

Compare all 17

Questions

Are 64 seats the daily sales ceiling?

No. Chef/table scheduling and funded support resources determine feasible daily guests.

Are drinks counted as extra diners?

No. They add sold menu units and revenue while guest counts remain separate.

Does a half-full table use half a chef cycle?

No. Every delivered session uses the full modeled engagement and occupancy cycle.

Does adding tables scale all costs?

No. Three designated asset bundles scale; premises and other budgets still need review.

Is the $619,000 funding a loan?

No. It is a single initial equity contribution; debt and owner distributions are zero.

Can I buy this model now?

No. Purchasing and workbook downloads are not available on this site.

Which software does the workbook use?

The documented file is an Excel workbook (.xlsx). Compatibility with other spreadsheet applications is not established by the file extension.

Evidence and scope

Primary operator examples support only the operating features described in the source registry. This full configuration, all formulas, local feasibility and numerical economics remain analyst-authored and unverified.

The links below provide operating-format context; they do not verify the workbook’s selected inputs or calculated returns.

The workbook guide and figures describe model PHY001-14, revision r02, for January 2027–December 2031. These are a documented planning case, not observed results for a particular business.

Read our methodology and how to read financial assumptions.